Grounding grounded theory : guidelines for qualitative inquiry
Impact in
- Education 155
- Journal
- Academic Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w5113248 →Countries where authors are citing Grounding grounded theory : guidelines for qualitative inquiry
This map shows the geographic impact of Grounding grounded theory : guidelines for qualitative inquiry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grounding grounded theory : guidelines for qualitative inquiry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grounding grounded theory : guidelines for qualitative inquiry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Grounding grounded theory : guidelines for qualitative inquiry
This network shows the impact of Grounding grounded theory : guidelines for qualitative inquiry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Grounding grounded theory : guidelines for qualitative inquiry.
About Grounding grounded theory : guidelines for qualitative inquiry
This paper, published in 1999, received 669 indexed citations . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (170 citations), Education (155 citations), General Health Professions (81 citations), Social Psychology (73 citations) and Clinical Psychology (71 citations). Published in Academic Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w5113248.