Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma.
Impact in
- Ophthalmology 289
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w46198136 →Countries where authors are citing Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma.
This map shows the geographic impact of Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma.
This network shows the impact of Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma..
About Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma.
This paper, published in 1999, received 400 indexed citations . Written by Ronald S. Harwerth, Louvenia Carter‐Dawson, Fran Shen, Earl Smith and M.L.J. Crawford covering the research area of Ophthalmology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ophthalmology (289 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (76 citations), Molecular Biology (53 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (14 citations) and Epidemiology (8 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w46198136.