Criteria, Strategies and Research Issues of Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning
Impact in
- Education 136
Classified as
- Journal
- Educational Technology & Society
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w2892847 →Countries where authors are citing Criteria, Strategies and Research Issues of Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning
This map shows the geographic impact of Criteria, Strategies and Research Issues of Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Criteria, Strategies and Research Issues of Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Criteria, Strategies and Research Issues of Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Criteria, Strategies and Research Issues of Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning
This network shows the impact of Criteria, Strategies and Research Issues of Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Criteria, Strategies and Research Issues of Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning.
About Criteria, Strategies and Research Issues of Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning
This paper, published in 2008, received 400 indexed citations . Written by Gwo Jen Hwang, Chin‐Chung Tsai and Stephen J.H. Yang covering the research area of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Hardware and Architecture and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (307 citations), Education (136 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (123 citations), Computer Science Applications (67 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (67 citations). Published in Educational Technology & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w2892847.