The adult spine : principles and practice
Impact in
- Pharmacology 195
Classified as
- Authors
- John W. FrymoyerThomas B. Ducker
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3487795 →Countries where authors are citing The adult spine : principles and practice
This map shows the geographic impact of The adult spine : principles and practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The adult spine : principles and practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The adult spine : principles and practice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The adult spine : principles and practice
This network shows the impact of The adult spine : principles and practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The adult spine : principles and practice.
About The adult spine : principles and practice
This paper, published in 1991, received 432 indexed citations . Written by John W. Frymoyer and Thomas B. Ducker covering the research area of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine (205 citations), Pharmacology (195 citations), Surgery (150 citations), Biomedical Engineering (36 citations) and Social Psychology (19 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3487795.