Class, codes, and control : theoretical studies towards a sociology of language

538 indexed citations
published 1975

Impact in

Authors
Basil Bernstein

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w3414959 →

Countries where authors are citing Class, codes, and control : theoretical studies towards a sociology of language

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Class, codes, and control : theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Class, codes, and control : theoretical studies towards a sociology of language with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Class, codes, and control : theoretical studies towards a sociology of language more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Class, codes, and control : theoretical studies towards a sociology of language

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Class, codes, and control : theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Class, codes, and control : theoretical studies towards a sociology of language.

About Class, codes, and control : theoretical studies towards a sociology of language

This paper, published in 1975, received 538 indexed citations . Written by Basil Bernstein. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (205 citations), Sociology and Political Science (197 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (117 citations), Language and Linguistics (110 citations) and Linguistics and Language (99 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w3414959.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper The Enchantment of Modern LifeBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Large Networks and Graph LimitsBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journalsBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper P-Body Formation Is a Consequence, Not the Cause, of RNA-Mediated Gene SilencingBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper How Large U.S. Companies Can Use Twitter and Other Social Media to Gain Business ValueBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Recycling of waste tire rubber in asphalt and portland cement concrete: An overviewBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease in primary careBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Recovering and Learning from Service FailureBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper CRISPRi-based genome-scale identification of functional long noncoding RNA loci in human cellsBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper What Works at Work: Overview and Assessment