Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare : a guide to best practice
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3250397 →Countries where authors are citing Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare : a guide to best practice
This map shows the geographic impact of Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare : a guide to best practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare : a guide to best practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare : a guide to best practice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare : a guide to best practice
This network shows the impact of Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare : a guide to best practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare : a guide to best practice.
About Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare : a guide to best practice
This paper, published in 2005, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk and Ellen Fineout‐Overholt covering the research area of General Health Professions. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (479 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (194 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (133 citations), Education (103 citations) and Epidemiology (81 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3250397.