Telecommunication networks: protocols, modeling and analysis
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Mischa Schwartz
- Journal
- Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3098523 →Countries where authors are citing Telecommunication networks: protocols, modeling and analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Telecommunication networks: protocols, modeling and analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Telecommunication networks: protocols, modeling and analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Telecommunication networks: protocols, modeling and analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Telecommunication networks: protocols, modeling and analysis
This network shows the impact of Telecommunication networks: protocols, modeling and analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Telecommunication networks: protocols, modeling and analysis.
About Telecommunication networks: protocols, modeling and analysis
This paper, published in 1986, received 584 indexed citations . Written by Mischa Schwartz covering the research area of Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Networks and Communications (449 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (294 citations), Management Information Systems (89 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (49 citations) and Hardware and Architecture (46 citations). Published in Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3098523.