Qualitative methods in organizational research: a practical guide
Impact in
- Authors
- Gillian Symon
- Journal
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w2998239 →Countries where authors are citing Qualitative methods in organizational research: a practical guide
This map shows the geographic impact of Qualitative methods in organizational research: a practical guide. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Qualitative methods in organizational research: a practical guide with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qualitative methods in organizational research: a practical guide more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Qualitative methods in organizational research: a practical guide
This network shows the impact of Qualitative methods in organizational research: a practical guide. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Qualitative methods in organizational research: a practical guide.
About Qualitative methods in organizational research: a practical guide
This paper, published in 1994, received 533 indexed citations . Written by Gillian Symon. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (133 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (129 citations), Sociology and Political Science (125 citations), Education (67 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (45 citations). Published in Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w2998239.