Das State-Trait-Angstinventar (STAI) : theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisung
Impact in
- Authors
- Lothar Laux
- Journal
- Beltz eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w2968128 →Countries where authors are citing Das State-Trait-Angstinventar (STAI) : theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisung
This map shows the geographic impact of Das State-Trait-Angstinventar (STAI) : theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisung. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Das State-Trait-Angstinventar (STAI) : theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Das State-Trait-Angstinventar (STAI) : theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisung more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Das State-Trait-Angstinventar (STAI) : theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisung
This network shows the impact of Das State-Trait-Angstinventar (STAI) : theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Das State-Trait-Angstinventar (STAI) : theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisung.
About Das State-Trait-Angstinventar (STAI) : theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisung
This paper, published in 1981, received 641 indexed citations . Written by Lothar Laux. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (209 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (204 citations), Clinical Psychology (140 citations), Social Psychology (105 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (88 citations). Published in Beltz eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w2968128.