Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance--United States, 1987-1990.
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w2917543306 →Countries where authors are citing Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance--United States, 1987-1990.
This map shows the geographic impact of Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance--United States, 1987-1990.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance--United States, 1987-1990. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance--United States, 1987-1990. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance--United States, 1987-1990.
This network shows the impact of Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance--United States, 1987-1990.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance--United States, 1987-1990..
About Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance--United States, 1987-1990.
This paper, published in 1997, received 497 indexed citations . Written by Koonin Lm, Cj Berg, Hani Khalil Atrash and Smith Jc covering the research area of General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Obstetrics and Gynecology (144 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (118 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (88 citations), Internal Medicine (74 citations) and General Health Professions (40 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w2917543306.