Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 1994.
Impact in
- Surgery 132
- Physiology 73
Classified as
- Authors
- Mel HallR PokrasL Lawrence
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w21069540 →Countries where authors are citing Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 1994.
This map shows the geographic impact of Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 1994.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 1994. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 1994. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 1994.
This network shows the impact of Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 1994.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 1994..
About Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 1994.
This paper, published in 1997, received 387 indexed citations . Written by Mel Hall, R Pokras and L Lawrence covering the research area of Emergency Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (132 citations), Physiology (73 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (38 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (27 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (23 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w21069540.