Algebraic combinatorics I : association schemes

578 indexed citations
published 1984
Authors
英一 坂内達郎 伊藤

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w1038103 →

Countries where authors are citing Algebraic combinatorics I : association schemes

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Algebraic combinatorics I : association schemes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Algebraic combinatorics I : association schemes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Algebraic combinatorics I : association schemes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Algebraic combinatorics I : association schemes

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Algebraic combinatorics I : association schemes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Algebraic combinatorics I : association schemes.

About Algebraic combinatorics I : association schemes

This paper, published in 1984, received 578 indexed citations . Written by 英一 坂内 and 達郎 伊藤 covering the research area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (433 citations), Artificial Intelligence (269 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (261 citations), Geometry and Topology (208 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (120 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w1038103.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact