Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland

1.2k indexed citations
published 1957

Countries where authors are citing Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland.

About Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland

This paper, published in 1957, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by John T. Hack covering the research area of Soil Science, Water Science and Technology and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (559 citations), Water Science and Technology (405 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (383 citations), Atmospheric Science (363 citations) and Soil Science (308 citations). Published in USGS professional paper.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3133/pp294b.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact