Neural progenitors, neurogenesis and the evolution of the neocortex
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Marta FlorioWieland Β. Huttner
- Journal
- Development
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1242/dev.090571 →Countries where authors are citing Neural progenitors, neurogenesis and the evolution of the neocortex
This map shows the geographic impact of Neural progenitors, neurogenesis and the evolution of the neocortex. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neural progenitors, neurogenesis and the evolution of the neocortex with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neural progenitors, neurogenesis and the evolution of the neocortex more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Neural progenitors, neurogenesis and the evolution of the neocortex
This network shows the impact of Neural progenitors, neurogenesis and the evolution of the neocortex. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Neural progenitors, neurogenesis and the evolution of the neocortex.
About Neural progenitors, neurogenesis and the evolution of the neocortex
This paper, published in 2014, received 437 indexed citations . Written by Marta Florio and Wieland Β. Huttner covering the research area of Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (306 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (199 citations), Genetics (104 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (89 citations) and Cell Biology (64 citations). Published in Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1242/dev.090571.