Annual Research Review: A meta‐analytic review of worldwide suicide rates in adolescents
Impact in
Classified as
Countries where authors are citing Annual Research Review: A meta‐analytic review of worldwide suicide rates in adolescents
This map shows the geographic impact of Annual Research Review: A meta‐analytic review of worldwide suicide rates in adolescents. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annual Research Review: A meta‐analytic review of worldwide suicide rates in adolescents with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Research Review: A meta‐analytic review of worldwide suicide rates in adolescents more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Annual Research Review: A meta‐analytic review of worldwide suicide rates in adolescents
This network shows the impact of Annual Research Review: A meta‐analytic review of worldwide suicide rates in adolescents. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Annual Research Review: A meta‐analytic review of worldwide suicide rates in adolescents.
About Annual Research Review: A meta‐analytic review of worldwide suicide rates in adolescents
This paper, published in 2019, received 244 indexed citations . Written by Catherine R. Glenn, Evan M. Kleiman, John K. Kellerman, Olivia H. Pollak, Erika C. Esposito, Andrew C. Porter and Peter A. Wyman covering the research area of Clinical Psychology and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (189 citations), Social Psychology (45 citations), Sociology and Political Science (22 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (17 citations) and Health (16 citations). Published in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13106.