Nonblinking and long-lasting single-molecule fluorescence imaging
Impact in
- Biophysics 273
Classified as
- Journal
- Nature Methods
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nmeth934 →Countries where authors are citing Nonblinking and long-lasting single-molecule fluorescence imaging
This map shows the geographic impact of Nonblinking and long-lasting single-molecule fluorescence imaging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nonblinking and long-lasting single-molecule fluorescence imaging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nonblinking and long-lasting single-molecule fluorescence imaging more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nonblinking and long-lasting single-molecule fluorescence imaging
This network shows the impact of Nonblinking and long-lasting single-molecule fluorescence imaging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nonblinking and long-lasting single-molecule fluorescence imaging.
About Nonblinking and long-lasting single-molecule fluorescence imaging
This paper, published in 2006, received 571 indexed citations . Written by Ivan Rasnik, Sean McKinney and Taekjip Ha covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Biophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (387 citations), Biophysics (273 citations), Biomedical Engineering (111 citations), Materials Chemistry (72 citations) and Structural Biology (66 citations). Published in Nature Methods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth934.