Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Nature Methods
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3929 →Countries where authors are citing Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging
This map shows the geographic impact of Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging
This network shows the impact of Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging.
About Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging
This paper, published in 2016, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Judith Weber, Paul C. Beard and Sarah E. Bohndiek covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (973 citations), Materials Chemistry (198 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (178 citations), Molecular Biology (172 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (146 citations). Published in Nature Methods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3929.