Comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation data with RnBeads

422 indexed citations
published 2014

Impact in

Classified as

Countries where authors are citing Comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation data with RnBeads

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation data with RnBeads. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation data with RnBeads with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation data with RnBeads more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation data with RnBeads

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation data with RnBeads. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation data with RnBeads.

About Comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation data with RnBeads

This paper, published in 2014, received 422 indexed citations . Written by Yassen Assenov, Fabian Müller, Pavlo Lutsik, Jörn Walter, Thomas Lengauer and Christoph Bock covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Genetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (271 citations), Genetics (80 citations), Cancer Research (47 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (33 citations) and Immunology (29 citations). Published in Nature Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3115.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact