Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition
Impact in
- Ecology 859
Classified as
- Journal
- Nature Methods
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3103 →Countries where authors are citing Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition
This map shows the geographic impact of Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition
This network shows the impact of Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition.
About Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition
This paper, published in 2014, received 1.7k indexed citations . Written by Johannes Alneberg, Ino de Bruijn, Melanie Schirmer, Joshua Quick, Umer Zeeshan Ijaz, Leo Lahti, Nicholas J. Loman, Anders F. Andersson and Christopher Quince covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Food Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (933 citations), Ecology (859 citations), Environmental Chemistry (263 citations), Pollution (234 citations) and Food Science (111 citations). Published in Nature Methods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3103.