Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung
Impact in
- Surgery 728
- Biomaterials 478
Classified as
- Journal
- Nature Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nm.2193 →Countries where authors are citing Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung
This map shows the geographic impact of Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung
This network shows the impact of Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung.
About Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung
This paper, published in 2010, received 837 indexed citations . Written by Harald C. Ott, Claudius Conrad, Christian Schuetz, Irina Pomerantseva, Laertis Ikonomou, Darrell N. Kotton and Joseph P. Vacanti covering the research area of Genetics, Surgery and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (728 citations), Biomaterials (478 citations), Biomedical Engineering (261 citations), Molecular Biology (129 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (110 citations). Published in Nature Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nm.2193.