Hard and soft acids and bases, HSAB, part II: Underlying theories
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Ralph G. Pearson
- Journal
- Journal of Chemical Education
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ed045p643 →Countries where authors are citing Hard and soft acids and bases, HSAB, part II: Underlying theories
This map shows the geographic impact of Hard and soft acids and bases, HSAB, part II: Underlying theories. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hard and soft acids and bases, HSAB, part II: Underlying theories with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hard and soft acids and bases, HSAB, part II: Underlying theories more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Hard and soft acids and bases, HSAB, part II: Underlying theories
This network shows the impact of Hard and soft acids and bases, HSAB, part II: Underlying theories. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Hard and soft acids and bases, HSAB, part II: Underlying theories.
About Hard and soft acids and bases, HSAB, part II: Underlying theories
This paper, published in 1968, received 861 indexed citations . Written by Ralph G. Pearson covering the research area of Environmental Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (309 citations), Materials Chemistry (241 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (226 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (96 citations) and Spectroscopy (84 citations). Published in Journal of Chemical Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ed045p643.