Molecular theory of gases and liquids
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Robert L. Scott
- Journal
- Journal of Chemical Education
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ed032p232.2 →Countries where authors are citing Molecular theory of gases and liquids
This map shows the geographic impact of Molecular theory of gases and liquids. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Molecular theory of gases and liquids with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular theory of gases and liquids more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Molecular theory of gases and liquids
This network shows the impact of Molecular theory of gases and liquids. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Molecular theory of gases and liquids.
About Molecular theory of gases and liquids
This paper, published in 1955, received 3.0k indexed citations . Written by Robert L. Scott covering the research area of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (920 citations), Biomedical Engineering (801 citations), Materials Chemistry (590 citations), Computational Mechanics (574 citations) and Spectroscopy (427 citations). Published in Journal of Chemical Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ed032p232.2.