Structure−Function Relationships of Alternative Nitrogenases
Impact in
- Catalysis 305
Classified as
- Authors
- Robert R. Eady
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr950057h →Countries where authors are citing Structure−Function Relationships of Alternative Nitrogenases
This map shows the geographic impact of Structure−Function Relationships of Alternative Nitrogenases. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Structure−Function Relationships of Alternative Nitrogenases with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Structure−Function Relationships of Alternative Nitrogenases more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Structure−Function Relationships of Alternative Nitrogenases
This network shows the impact of Structure−Function Relationships of Alternative Nitrogenases. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Structure−Function Relationships of Alternative Nitrogenases.
About Structure−Function Relationships of Alternative Nitrogenases
This paper, published in 1996, received 677 indexed citations . Written by Robert R. Eady covering the research area of Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Catalysis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (472 citations), Catalysis (305 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (203 citations), Materials Chemistry (152 citations) and Organic Chemistry (92 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr950057h.