Ultra-High-Speed DNA Sequencing Using Capillary Electrophoresis Chips
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Analytical Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ac00116a010 →Countries where authors are citing Ultra-High-Speed DNA Sequencing Using Capillary Electrophoresis Chips
This map shows the geographic impact of Ultra-High-Speed DNA Sequencing Using Capillary Electrophoresis Chips. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ultra-High-Speed DNA Sequencing Using Capillary Electrophoresis Chips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ultra-High-Speed DNA Sequencing Using Capillary Electrophoresis Chips more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Ultra-High-Speed DNA Sequencing Using Capillary Electrophoresis Chips
This network shows the impact of Ultra-High-Speed DNA Sequencing Using Capillary Electrophoresis Chips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ultra-High-Speed DNA Sequencing Using Capillary Electrophoresis Chips.
About Ultra-High-Speed DNA Sequencing Using Capillary Electrophoresis Chips
This paper, published in 1995, received 491 indexed citations . Written by Adam T. Woolley and Richard A. Mathies covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (458 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (153 citations), Molecular Biology (57 citations), Spectroscopy (32 citations) and Bioengineering (23 citations). Published in Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ac00116a010.