The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study

420 indexed citations
published 2012

Countries where authors are citing The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study.

About The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study

This paper, published in 2012, received 420 indexed citations . Written by Roy Wendler covering the research area of Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Information Systems (168 citations), Strategy and Management (113 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (89 citations), Information Systems (70 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (66 citations). Published in Information and Software Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.007.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact