Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Statistics in Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/sim.7141 →Countries where authors are citing Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ
This map shows the geographic impact of Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ
This network shows the impact of Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ.
About Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ
This paper, published in 2016, received 285 indexed citations . Written by Danielle Burke, Joie Ensor and Richard D Riley covering the research area of Statistics and Probability, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (54 citations), Statistics and Probability (44 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (19 citations), Epidemiology (19 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (18 citations). Published in Statistics in Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/sim.7141.