Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers
Impact in
- Nephrology 166
Classified as
- Journal
- Statistics in Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/sim.4085 →Countries where authors are citing Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers
This map shows the geographic impact of Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers
This network shows the impact of Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers.
About Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers
This paper, published in 2010, received 1.9k indexed citations . Written by Michael Pencina, Ralph B. D’Agostino and Ewout W. Steyerberg covering the research area of Statistics and Probability, Economics and Econometrics and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (420 citations), Nephrology (166 citations), Surgery (163 citations), Epidemiology (158 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (113 citations). Published in Statistics in Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/sim.4085.