A method for meta-analysis of molecular association studies
Impact in
- Genetics 69
Classified as
- Journal
- Statistics in Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/sim.2010 →Countries where authors are citing A method for meta-analysis of molecular association studies
This map shows the geographic impact of A method for meta-analysis of molecular association studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A method for meta-analysis of molecular association studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A method for meta-analysis of molecular association studies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A method for meta-analysis of molecular association studies
This network shows the impact of A method for meta-analysis of molecular association studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A method for meta-analysis of molecular association studies.
About A method for meta-analysis of molecular association studies
This paper, published in 2004, received 529 indexed citations . Written by Ammarin Thakkinstian, Patrick McElduff, Catherine D’Este, David L. Duffy and John Attia covering the research area of Genetics and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (123 citations), Genetics (69 citations), Immunology (59 citations), Cancer Research (56 citations) and Oncology (53 citations). Published in Statistics in Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/sim.2010.