UCSF ChimeraX: Tools for structure building and analysis

1.8k indexed citations
published 2023

Impact in

Classified as

Countries where authors are citing UCSF ChimeraX: Tools for structure building and analysis

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of UCSF ChimeraX: Tools for structure building and analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by UCSF ChimeraX: Tools for structure building and analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites UCSF ChimeraX: Tools for structure building and analysis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing UCSF ChimeraX: Tools for structure building and analysis

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of UCSF ChimeraX: Tools for structure building and analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the UCSF ChimeraX: Tools for structure building and analysis.

About UCSF ChimeraX: Tools for structure building and analysis

This paper, published in 2023, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by Elaine C. Meng, Thomas D. Goddard, Eric F. Pettersen, John H. Morris and Thomas E. Ferrin covering the research area of Software, Molecular Biology and Hardware and Architecture. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (982 citations), Cell Biology (148 citations), Genetics (147 citations), Plant Science (137 citations) and Infectious Diseases (134 citations). Published in Protein Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/pro.4792.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact