Zhujun Fu

606 citations
13 papers · 397 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
    • Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
  • Epidemiology top 10%
    • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

Papers in

Zhujun Fu

13 papers receiving 383 citations

Peers

Zhujun Fu
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Ophthalmology 80
  • Epidemiology 260
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 62
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 49
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 52
Replace Zhale Rajavi with:
Zhale Rajavi Iran
Süheyla Köse Türkiye
Ichiro Hamasaki Japan
B. Michele Melia United States
Alison Bruce United Kingdom
J. F. Leone Australia
Jaime Tejedor Spain
Jan Tjeerd de Faber Netherlands
Josefin Ohlsson Sweden
Ralph Becker Germany
Zhujun Fu relative to Zhale Rajavi Iran Zhale Rajavi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Zhale Rajavi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zhujun Fu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zhujun Fu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zhujun Fu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zhujun Fu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zhujun Fu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zhujun Fu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zhujun Fu. The network helps show where Zhujun Fu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Zhujun Fu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zhujun Fu Line = papers co-authored together Zhujun Fu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2019118
2 2015104
3 201732
4 201924
5 201724
6 201724
7 201522
8 201613
9 201912
10 20229
11 20177
12 20175
13 20223

About Zhujun Fu

Zhujun Fu is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Molecular Biology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (8 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (1 paper), Child Abuse and Related Trauma (1 paper), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper) and Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (80 citations), Epidemiology (260 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (62 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (49 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (52 citations). Zhujun Fu has collaborated with scholars based in China. Frequent co-authors include Hu Liu, Chen‐Wei Pan, Hui Zhu, Xuejuan Chen, Hui Ding, Jing Bai, Ji Chen, Dan Huang, Jiajia Yu and Chen Ji. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, Scientific Reports, BMJ Open, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules and Optometry and Vision Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact