Youngmoo E. Kim

124 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Youngmoo E. Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Signal Processing 1.1k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 840
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 710
  • Music 106
  • Ceramics and Composites 110
Replace Alex McLean with:
Alex McLean Canada
Mikko A. Uusitalo Finland
Ramanathan Subramanian India
Giovanni De Poli Italy
Brian F. G. Katz France
Keiichi Tokuda Japan
Davide Rocchesso Italy
Gil Weinberg United States
Federico Avanzini Italy
Xinyu Jiang China
Youngmoo E. Kim relative to Alex McLean Canada Alex McLean's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.8×
Alex McLean · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Youngmoo E. Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Youngmoo E. Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Youngmoo E. Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Youngmoo E. Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Youngmoo E. Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Youngmoo E. Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Youngmoo E. Kim. The network helps show where Youngmoo E. Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Youngmoo E. Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Youngmoo E. Kim Line = papers co-authored together Youngmoo E. Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 130 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Music emotion recognition: A state of the art review
2010271
2 2009196
3 2017130
4 201095
5 200693
6 200893
7 201484
8 201169
9 201168
10 201066
11 201065
12 201058
13 201053
14 201653
15 201248
16 201147
17 202046
18 201738
19 201638
20 200036

About Youngmoo E. Kim

Youngmoo E. Kim is a scholar working on Signal Processing, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Music and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 130 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Technology and Sound Studies (62 papers), Music and Audio Processing (62 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (36 papers), Advanced materials and composites (21 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (17 papers), Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials (12 papers), Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties (7 papers) and Injection Molding Process and Properties (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (1.1k citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (840 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (710 citations), Music (106 citations) and Ceramics and Composites (110 citations). Youngmoo E. Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Erik M. Schmidt, Douglas Turnbull, Eun‐Pyo Kim, Brandon G. Morton, Sung Ho Lee, Jeffrey J. Scott, Hasan Ayaz, Raymond Migneco, Andrew McPherson and Patrick Richardson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, IEEE Multimedia, Metals and Materials International and Powder Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact