Yoshimichi Ejima

1.9k citations
127 papers · 1.4k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Yoshimichi Ejima

120 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Yoshimichi Ejima
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 901
  • Sensory Systems 65
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 163
  • Social Psychology 225
  • Ophthalmology 64
Replace G. Sclar with:
G. Sclar United States
Jukka Saarinen Finland
Hüseyin Boyacı United States
Helen Jones United Kingdom
Chou P. Hung United States
Yan Zhuo China
Mark Roberts United Kingdom
Allison N. McCoy United States
Katja Doerschner Türkiye
John M. Crook Germany
Yoshimichi Ejima relative to G. Sclar United States G. Sclar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
G. Sclar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Yoshimichi Ejima

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Yoshimichi Ejima's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yoshimichi Ejima with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yoshimichi Ejima more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Yoshimichi Ejima

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yoshimichi Ejima. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yoshimichi Ejima. The network helps show where Yoshimichi Ejima may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Yoshimichi Ejima, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Yoshimichi Ejima Line = papers co-authored together Yoshimichi Ejima links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 127 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200687
2 198584
3 198861
4 201959
5 200252
6 198951
7 200339
8 201335
9 201732
10 198728
11 198427
12 199826
13 200626
14 199825
15 200224
16 198724
17 198623
18 200621
19 198520
20 199218

About Yoshimichi Ejima

Yoshimichi Ejima is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 127 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (73 papers), Color Science and Applications (27 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (27 papers), Color perception and design (23 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (15 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (10 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (901 citations), Sensory Systems (65 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (163 citations), Social Psychology (225 citations) and Ophthalmology (64 citations). Yoshimichi Ejima has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Shigeko Takahashi, Yoshio Ohtani, M.S. Sasaki, Naokazu Goda, Jiajia Yang, Shin’ya Nishida, Jinglong Wu, Michael J. Lyons, Akihiro Kaneko and Yinghua Yu. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Perception, Attention Perception & Psychophysics, Journal of Neurophysiology and Journal of the Optical Society of America A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact