Yoshimichi Ejima

1.9k citations
133 papers · 1.5k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Yoshimichi Ejima

128 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Yoshimichi Ejima
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 913
  • Sensory Systems 69
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 171
  • Social Psychology 233
  • Ophthalmology 69
Replace G. Sclar with:
G. Sclar United States
Mark J. Wagner United States
Jukka Saarinen Finland
Helen Jones United Kingdom
Mark Roberts United Kingdom
Chou P. Hung United States
Hüseyin Boyacı Türkiye
Yan Zhuo China
John M. Crook Germany
G. Baumgartner Switzerland
Yoshimichi Ejima relative to G. Sclar United States G. Sclar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
G. Sclar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Yoshimichi Ejima

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Yoshimichi Ejima's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yoshimichi Ejima with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yoshimichi Ejima more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Yoshimichi Ejima

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yoshimichi Ejima. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yoshimichi Ejima. The network helps show where Yoshimichi Ejima may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Yoshimichi Ejima, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Yoshimichi Ejima Line = papers co-authored together Yoshimichi Ejima links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 133 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200688
2 198586
3 198869
4 201961
5 200255
6 198954
7 200342
8 201341
9 201735
10 198429
11 198728
12 200626
13 199826
14 198725
15 200225
16 199825
17 198623
18 200621
19 198521
20 200320

About Yoshimichi Ejima

Yoshimichi Ejima is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Social Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 133 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (76 papers), Color Science and Applications (29 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (28 papers), Color perception and design (24 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (14 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (10 papers) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (913 citations), Sensory Systems (69 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (171 citations), Social Psychology (233 citations) and Ophthalmology (69 citations). Yoshimichi Ejima has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Shigeko Takahashi, Yoshio Ohtani, M.S. Sasaki, Jiajia Yang, Naokazu Goda, Jinglong Wu, Shin’ya Nishida, Michael J. Lyons, Hiroshi Tanooka and Akihiro Kaneko. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Perception, Attention Perception & Psychophysics, Neuroreport and International Journal of Radiation Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact