Ying Li

6.9k citations
244 papers · 5.8k · h-index 41

Impact in

Papers in

Ying Li

232 papers receiving 5.7k citations

Peers

Ying Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.1k
  • Ocean Engineering 751
  • Materials Chemistry 2.2k
  • Organic Chemistry 870
  • Catalysis 211
Replace Xiaoxia Li with:
Xiaoxia Li China
Ashleigh J. Fletcher United Kingdom
Xun Sun China
Shi Li China
Rakesh Kumar Gupta United States
Jingyi Wang China
Per Stenius Finland
Kang Zhou China
Artur P. Terzyk Poland
Maciej Harańczyk United States
Ying Li relative to Xiaoxia Li China Xiaoxia Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Xiaoxia Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ying Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ying Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ying Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ying Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ying Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ying Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ying Li. The network helps show where Ying Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ying Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ying Li Line = papers co-authored together Ying Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 244 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005317
2 2010175
3 1993155
4 2004140
5 2016139
6 2021130
7 2017127
8 2020126
9 2020108
10 2012100
11 202293
12 201190
13 201383
14 202182
15 201979
16 200579
17 201179
18 201075
19 200672
20 200069

About Ying Li

Ying Li is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Organic Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 244 papers that have together received 5.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (29 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (28 papers), MXene and MAX Phase Materials (21 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (20 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Research (20 papers), Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (20 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (17 papers) and Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.1k citations), Ocean Engineering (751 citations), Materials Chemistry (2.2k citations), Organic Chemistry (870 citations) and Catalysis (211 citations). Ying Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Zhi‐Ru Li, Di Wu, Chia‐Chung Sun, Dechun Li, Hongwei Chu, Na Qi, Hui Zhao, Shengzhi Zhao, Baoyu Gao and Qinyan Yue. Their work appears in journals such as Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, Optics Express, Chemical Engineering Journal, RSC Advances and Materials Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact