Ying Dai

19 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

Ying Dai
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Ophthalmology 99
  • Emergency Medicine 55
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 88
  • Cancer Research 32
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 28
Replace Teslime Ayaz with:
Teslime Ayaz Türkiye
Z Roth United States
Gopika SenthilKumar United States
Younghwan Kim South Korea
Kasım Demir Türkiye
Yoon Jung Kang South Korea
Ian N. Scobie United Kingdom
Juergen Wellmann Germany
Rita Gangwani Hong Kong
Rosa Marlene Viero Brazil
Ying Dai relative to Teslime Ayaz Türkiye Teslime Ayaz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.8×
Teslime Ayaz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ying Dai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ying Dai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ying Dai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ying Dai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ying Dai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ying Dai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ying Dai. The network helps show where Ying Dai may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ying Dai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ying Dai Line = papers co-authored together Ying Dai links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201476
2 201146
3 201441
4
Identification of inflammatory mediators in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment associated with choroidal detachment.
201538
5 202037
6 201821
7 202115
8 201614
9 201710
10 20149
11 20118
12 20236
13 20176
14 20145
15 20183
16 20241
17 20211
18 20181
19 20231
20 20230

About Ying Dai

Ying Dai is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Ophthalmology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 20 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal and Macular Surgery (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers), Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (1 paper) and Connective tissue disorders research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (99 citations), Emergency Medicine (55 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (88 citations), Cancer Research (32 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (28 citations). Ying Dai has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Harlan M. Krumholz, Zhifeng Wu, Zhengwei Zhang, Joseph S. Ross, Jeremiah D. Schuur, Roberta Capp, Arjun K. Venkatesh, Yawei Zhang, Tongzhang Zheng and Shuangge Ma. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine, Medical Care, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Circulation Heart Failure and Frontiers in Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact