Y Achiam

466 citations
25 papers · 396 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Y Achiam

25 papers receiving 346 citations

Peers

Y Achiam
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Condensed Matter Physics 359
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 158
  • Mathematical Physics 98
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 198
  • Statistics and Probability 34
Replace S. Naya with:
S. Naya Japan
John Stephenson Australia
Katarina Uzelac Croatia
Ihnsouk Guim United States
D. M. Saul United States
M G Watts United Kingdom
Ikuo Ono Japan
Klaus Oerding Germany
Hidetsugu Kitatani Japan
Kenneth Hui United States
Y Achiam relative to S. Naya Japan S. Naya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
S. Naya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Y Achiam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Y Achiam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Y Achiam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Y Achiam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Y Achiam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Y Achiam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Y Achiam. The network helps show where Y Achiam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Y Achiam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Y Achiam Line = papers co-authored together Y Achiam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197864
2 198637
3 197532
4 198530
5 198530
6 197826
7 198523
8 197822
9 198322
10 197913
11 198611
12 198011
13 198010
14 19779
15 19779
16 19808
17 19798
18 19747
19 19935
20 19934

About Y Achiam

Y Achiam is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Mathematical Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Statistics and Probability, having authored 25 papers that have together received 396 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (23 papers), Quantum many-body systems (13 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (13 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (7 papers), Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (2 papers) and Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (359 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (158 citations), Mathematical Physics (98 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (198 citations) and Statistics and Probability (34 citations). Y Achiam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. Michael Kosterlitz, Y. Imry, T. C. Lubensky, B. W. Southern and David J. Bergman. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters A, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Physical Review Letters, Journal of Low Temperature Physics and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact