Xin‐Zu Chen

3.8k citations
144 papers · 2.7k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Xin‐Zu Chen

142 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Xin‐Zu Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Gastroenterology 261
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.2k
  • Oncology 651
  • Surgery 770
  • Cancer Research 151
Replace Mikihito Nakamori with:
Mikihito Nakamori Japan
James J. Mezhir United States
Makoto Iwahashi Japan
Tadashi Nishimaki Japan
Luca Saragoni Italy
Toshiyasu Ojima Japan
Daisuke Korenaga Japan
Filippo Navaglia Italy
Enqiang Linghu China
Yuji Tachimori Japan
Xin‐Zu Chen relative to Mikihito Nakamori Japan Mikihito Nakamori's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Mikihito Nakamori · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xin‐Zu Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xin‐Zu Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xin‐Zu Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xin‐Zu Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xin‐Zu Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xin‐Zu Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xin‐Zu Chen. The network helps show where Xin‐Zu Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xin‐Zu Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xin‐Zu Chen Line = papers co-authored together Xin‐Zu Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 144 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011152
2 2015124
3 2015102
4 2015101
5 201294
6 201589
7 200771
8 201469
9 201366
10 201263
11 201656
12 200955
13 201947
14 200943
15 201539
16 202036
17 201336
18 202035
19 201635
20 200835

About Xin‐Zu Chen

Xin‐Zu Chen is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Gastroenterology, Surgery, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 144 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (89 papers), Metastasis and carcinoma case studies (32 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (21 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (19 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (12 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (8 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (7 papers) and Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (261 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.2k citations), Oncology (651 citations), Surgery (770 citations) and Cancer Research (151 citations). Xin‐Zu Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kun Yang, Jian‐Kun Hu, Zong‐Guang Zhou, Weihan Zhang, Xiao‐Long Chen, Bo Zhang, Zhixin Chen, Kai Liu, Jiaping Chen and Jian‐Kun Hu. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine, Oncotarget, Frontiers in Oncology, World Journal of Gastroenterology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact