Xingjun Meng

753 citations
20 papers · 566 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Xingjun Meng

20 papers receiving 560 citations

Peers

Xingjun Meng
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Biological Psychiatry 24
  • Neurology 76
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 156
  • Neurology 95
  • Cancer Research 77
Replace Xiangdong Hua with:
Xiangdong Hua China
Huichun Tong China
Mei‐Hong Lu China
Enrique Luengo Spain
Lucie Delattre France
Katrin Andreasson United States
Michail S. Kukharsky Russia
Fuyao Li China
Irene Llorente‐Folch Spain
Thorsten Mengesdorf Germany
Xingjun Meng relative to Xiangdong Hua China Xiangdong Hua's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.5×
Xiangdong Hua · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xingjun Meng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xingjun Meng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xingjun Meng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xingjun Meng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xingjun Meng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xingjun Meng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xingjun Meng. The network helps show where Xingjun Meng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xingjun Meng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xingjun Meng Line = papers co-authored together Xingjun Meng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201784
2 201878
3 201948
4 202041
5 201937
6 201934
7 201432
8 201731
9 202123
10 202122
11 202221
12 202119
13
Elevated DNA polymerase iota (Poli) is involved in the acquisition of aggressive phenotypes of human esophageal squamous cell cancer.
201517
14 202117
15 202215
16 202112
17
Microarray analysis of anti-cancer effects of docosahexaenoic acid on human colon cancer model in nude mice.
201511
18 202011
19 20227
20 20236

About Xingjun Meng

Xingjun Meng is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Research, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (4 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (3 papers), RNA regulation and disease (3 papers), Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research (2 papers) and Conducting polymers and applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (24 citations), Neurology (76 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (156 citations), Neurology (95 citations) and Cancer Research (77 citations). Xingjun Meng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Shaogang Qu, Huichun Tong, Yunlong Zhang, Xiuping Zhang, Dongmei Mai, Xiuping Zhang, Xiaojuan Wu, Xiaoliang He, Lingli Lu and Ping-yi Xu. Their work appears in journals such as ACS Chemical Neuroscience, Neuro-Oncology, The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, Aging and Cell Death and Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact