Xin Tie

435 citations
24 papers · 264 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Xin Tie

19 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers

Xin Tie
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Health Informatics 58
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 184
  • Radiation 30
  • Health Information Management 9
  • Artificial Intelligence 57
Replace Chengzhu Zhang with:
Chengzhu Zhang United States
Fredrik Löfman Sweden
Tin Lok Chiu Hong Kong
Sumeet Hindocha United Kingdom
Dariush Askari Iran
Yazdan Salimi Switzerland
Reza Reiazi Iran
Chayanin Nitiwarangkul Thailand
Maria Teodora Wetscherek United Kingdom
Keno März Germany
Xin Tie relative to Chengzhu Zhang United States Chengzhu Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Chengzhu Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xin Tie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xin Tie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xin Tie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xin Tie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xin Tie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xin Tie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xin Tie. The network helps show where Xin Tie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xin Tie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xin Tie Line = papers co-authored together Xin Tie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202095
2 202057
3 202420
4 202418
5 202012
6 202411
7 202410
8 20259
9 20219
10 20215
11 20234
12 20234
13 20253
14 20232
15 20241
16 20251
17 20241
18 20241
19 20221
20 20250

About Xin Tie

Xin Tie is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Artificial Intelligence, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (8 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers), COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (3 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (2 papers) and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (58 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (184 citations), Radiation (30 citations), Health Information Management (9 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (57 citations). Xin Tie has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Kwok‐Hung Au, Saikit Lam, Yong Zhang, Jing Cai, Guang‐Hong Chen, Zhihua Qi, John W. Garrett, Chengzhu Zhang, Tyler Bradshaw and Ke Li. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Physics, Frontiers in Medicine, Radiology Artificial Intelligence, Scientific Reports and RSC Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact