Xin Ding

1.6k citations
24 papers · 1.3k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Xin Ding

24 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Xin Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Microbiology 240
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 239
  • Organic Chemistry 697
  • Molecular Medicine 86
  • Biomaterials 172
Replace Thuy‐Khanh Nguyen with:
Thuy‐Khanh Nguyen Australia
Matthias Hartlieb Germany
Iraida Loinaz Spain
Francisco Fernández‐Trillo United Kingdom
Julian M. W. Chan United States
Aasheesh Srivastava India
Tianqi Liu China
Blanca González Spain
Lewis D. Blackman United Kingdom
Xin Ding relative to Thuy‐Khanh Nguyen Australia Thuy‐Khanh Nguyen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Thuy‐Khanh Nguyen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xin Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xin Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xin Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xin Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xin Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xin Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xin Ding. The network helps show where Xin Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xin Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xin Ding Line = papers co-authored together Xin Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012289
2 2018288
3 2012233
4 2018120
5 201676
6 202164
7 202043
8 202032
9 202032
10 202031
11 202031
12 202222
13 202118
14 201614
15 20209
16 20198
17 20238
18 20247
19 20245
20 20204

About Xin Ding

Xin Ding is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Microbiology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antimicrobial agents and applications (7 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (6 papers), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (3 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (3 papers), Fungal Plant Pathogen Control (3 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (3 papers), Crystal structures of chemical compounds (3 papers) and Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (240 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (239 citations), Organic Chemistry (697 citations), Molecular Medicine (86 citations) and Biomaterials (172 citations). Xin Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, Singapore and United States. Frequent co-authors include James L. Hedrick, Chuan Yang, Yi‐Yan Yang, Amanda C. Engler, Li Yang Hsu, Tze Peng Lim, Yi Yan Yang, Yuan Huang, Yan Li and Wei Fan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Science China Materials, Nature Communications, Advanced Science and Organic Chemistry Frontiers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact