Xiaoling Lin

4.4k citations
198 papers · 2.6k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Xiaoling Lin

178 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Xiaoling Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
  • Inorganic Chemistry 323
  • Molecular Medicine 109
  • Cancer Research 199
  • Food Science 247
  • Materials Chemistry 438
Replace Qingqing Xu with:
Qingqing Xu China
Shuang Zhang China
Caiyun Zhang China
Jun‐O Jin South Korea
Yaodong Zhang China
Ting Wang China
Nan Zhang China
Zhaoxia Chen China
Ramesh Chandra India
Xinran Dong China
Xiaoling Lin relative to Qingqing Xu China Qingqing Xu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Qingqing Xu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaoling Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaoling Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaoling Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaoling Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaoling Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaoling Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaoling Lin. The network helps show where Xiaoling Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaoling Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaoling Lin Line = papers co-authored together Xiaoling Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 198 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014122
2 2021116
3 2021102
4 201967
5 201353
6 202152
7 202148
8 201547
9 202144
10 201243
11 202142
12 200741
13 201440
14 202140
15 201840
16 202237
17 201434
18 202233
19 202132
20 201632

About Xiaoling Lin

Xiaoling Lin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 198 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (18 papers), Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications (15 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (9 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (8 papers), Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design (7 papers), 3D IC and TSV technologies (6 papers) and Urological Disorders and Treatments (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (323 citations), Molecular Medicine (109 citations), Cancer Research (199 citations), Food Science (247 citations) and Materials Chemistry (438 citations). Xiaoling Lin has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Linjie Huang, Jun Ying, Dali Lu, Xiuli Wang, Shanping Jiang, Na Li, Yang Yang, Jianfeng Xu, Ai‐Xiang Tian and Zhiqiang Lv. Their work appears in journals such as The Prostate, Asian Journal of Andrology, Journal of Affective Disorders, PLoS ONE and Dalton Transactions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact