Xiaolin Chen

4.3k citations
162 papers · 3.5k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Xiaolin Chen

154 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Xiaolin Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
  • Aquatic Science 399
  • Biomaterials 709
  • Molecular Medicine 228
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 308
  • Plant Science 665
Replace Song Liu with:
Song Liu China
Ángeles Jos Spain
Yang Ding China
Yue Zhang China
Farid Menaa United States
Saphwan Al‐Assaf United Kingdom
Alain Buléon France
Jinhee Choi South Korea
Zhaojie Li China
BoMi Ryu South Korea
Xiaolin Chen relative to Song Liu China Song Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Song Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaolin Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaolin Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaolin Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaolin Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaolin Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaolin Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaolin Chen. The network helps show where Xiaolin Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaolin Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaolin Chen Line = papers co-authored together Xiaolin Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 162 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018147
2 2017129
3 2012112
4 2019102
5 201997
6 200691
7 201889
8 201175
9 201770
10 202270
11 201567
12 200767
13 201665
14 200763
15 201861
16 201560
17 201559
18 202155
19 201855
20 201851

About Xiaolin Chen

Xiaolin Chen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomaterials, Aquatic Science, Organic Chemistry and Plant Science, having authored 162 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging (19 papers), Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds (15 papers), Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements (11 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (8 papers), Plant Growth Enhancement Techniques (8 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (8 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (8 papers) and Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (399 citations), Biomaterials (709 citations), Molecular Medicine (228 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (308 citations) and Plant Science (665 citations). Xiaolin Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Pengcheng Li, Song Liu, Ronge Xing, Huahua Yu, Kecheng Li, Yukun Qin, Xueqin Wang, Rongfeng Li, Xia Ji and Lin Song. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Carbohydrate Polymers, BioMed Research International, Molecules and PeerJ.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact