Xiao Hu
Impact in
- Insect Science top 1%
- Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Fungal Biology and Applications
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Chengshu Wang (4 shared papers)Peng Zheng (4 shared papers)Guohua Xiao (4 shared papers)Xingzhong Liu (3 shared papers)Raymond J. St. Leger (3 shared papers)Yongliang Xia (3 shared papers)William C. Regli (1 shared paper)Mary Atwood (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Poultry Science (1 paper)The ISME Journal (1 paper)Molecular & Cellular Proteomics (1 paper)Bioinformatics (1 paper)BMC Veterinary Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaJapan
In The Last Decade
Xiao Hu
36 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Xiao Hu's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
- Insect Science 535
- Pharmacology 314
- Plant Science 410
- Management of Technology and Innovation 66
- Molecular Biology 648
Countries citing papers authored by Xiao Hu
This map shows the geographic impact of Xiao Hu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiao Hu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiao Hu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Xiao Hu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiao Hu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiao Hu. The network helps show where Xiao Hu may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiao Hu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Genome sequence of the insect pathogenic fungus Cordyceps militaris, a valued traditional chinese medicine Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 370 |
| 2 | 2014 | 232 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 170 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 170 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 114 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 98 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 82 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 61 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 54 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 44 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 30 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 10 |
About Xiao Hu
Xiao Hu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fault Detection and Control Systems (4 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (4 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (3 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (2 papers), Advanced Measurement and Detection Methods (2 papers) and Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (535 citations), Pharmacology (314 citations), Plant Science (410 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (66 citations) and Molecular Biology (648 citations). Xiao Hu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Chengshu Wang, Peng Zheng, Guohua Xiao, Xingzhong Liu, Raymond J. St. Leger, Yongliang Xia, William C. Regli, Mary Atwood, Wei Sun and Shuai Zhan. Their work appears in journals such as Poultry Science, The ISME Journal, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, Bioinformatics and BMC Veterinary Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.