Xiangjin Chen

739 citations
38 papers · 549 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Xiangjin Chen

37 papers receiving 546 citations

Peers

Xiangjin Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 113
  • Cancer Research 90
  • Oncology 149
  • Immunology 71
  • Genetics 27
Replace Emily Siegel with:
Emily Siegel United States
Qiuxia Cui China
Liping Chung Australia
Zongyu Li China
Jeremy Warshauer United States
Jianfeng Sang China
Ruifeng Shi China
Zhan Liao China
Sora Jeon South Korea
Rie Ayuzawa United States
Xiangjin Chen relative to Emily Siegel United States Emily Siegel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Emily Siegel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiangjin Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiangjin Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiangjin Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiangjin Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiangjin Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiangjin Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiangjin Chen. The network helps show where Xiangjin Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiangjin Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiangjin Chen Line = papers co-authored together Xiangjin Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201893
2 201860
3
Significance of TLR4/MyD88 expression in breast cancer.
201541
4 201734
5 201533
6 202331
7 202325
8 201524
9 201724
10 202321
11 202014
12 202113
13 202113
14 201812
15 202111
16 202111
17 202110
18 20229
19 20218
20 20228

About Xiangjin Chen

Xiangjin Chen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cancer Research, Plant Science and Oncology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 549 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (3 papers), Soybean genetics and cultivation (3 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (3 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (2 papers), S100 Proteins and Annexins (2 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (2 papers) and Circular RNAs in diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (113 citations), Cancer Research (90 citations), Oncology (149 citations), Immunology (71 citations) and Genetics (27 citations). Xiangjin Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Youzhi Zhu, Kunlin Wu, Huihao Zhang, Lingjun Kong, Ling Chen, Feng Zhao, Junyu Lin, Sunwang Xu, Weibing Miao and Feng Du. Their work appears in journals such as Cell Death Discovery, Agronomy, Cell Death and Disease, Frontiers in Oncology and EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact