Xiang‐Gui Li

477 citations
49 papers · 376 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Xiang‐Gui Li

45 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers

Xiang‐Gui Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Numerical Analysis 132
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 129
  • Modeling and Simulation 30
  • Mathematical Physics 41
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 142
Replace Naeem Ullah with:
Naeem Ullah Pakistan
Daniel J. Arrigo United States
Jameel F. Alzaidi Saudi Arabia
C. J. Magee United States
Zehra Pınar Türkiye
Robert Buckingham United States
Harris Hancock United States
Yunzhou Sun China
M. Sommacal Italy
Jiaxiang Cai China
Xiang‐Gui Li relative to Naeem Ullah Pakistan Naeem Ullah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×31×
Naeem Ullah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiang‐Gui Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiang‐Gui Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiang‐Gui Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiang‐Gui Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiang‐Gui Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiang‐Gui Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiang‐Gui Li. The network helps show where Xiang‐Gui Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiang‐Gui Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiang‐Gui Li Line = papers co-authored together Xiang‐Gui Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200446
2 201429
3 201420
4 200617
5 200315
6 200414
7 201214
8 201714
9 201314
10 201412
11 202311
12 200211
13 201711
14 200210
15 201210
16 20039
17 20189
18 20238
19 20168
20 20028

About Xiang‐Gui Li

Xiang‐Gui Li is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Numerical Analysis, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computational Mechanics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 49 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (15 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (14 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (10 papers), Strong Light-Matter Interactions (9 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (9 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (7 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (7 papers) and Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (132 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (129 citations), Modeling and Simulation (30 citations), Mathematical Physics (41 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (142 citations). Xiang‐Gui Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Deng‐Shan Wang, Weizhu Bao, Chi Kin Chan, Jiang Zhu, C. K. Chan, Xijun Yu, Xian-Geng Zhao, Ping Zhang, Rongpei Zhang and Wei Yan. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in Difference Equations, Journal of Computational Physics, Physics Letters A, Physica B Condensed Matter and Advances in Complex Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact