Wouter Van Bogaert

400 citations
16 papers · 223 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Wouter Van Bogaert

14 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers

Wouter Van Bogaert
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Pharmacology 168
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 64
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 19
  • Rehabilitation 19
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 49
Replace Ying Wu Cheng with:
Ying Wu Cheng China
Eveline Van Looveren Belgium
Sevilay Tümkaya Yılmaz Belgium
Miriam van Ittersum Netherlands
Ömer Elma Belgium
Mazyad Alotaibi Saudi Arabia
D. Ellington United Kingdom
Paraskevi Bilika Greece
Daniel Oluwafemi Odebiyi Nigeria
Rodrigo R N Rizzo Australia
Wouter Van Bogaert relative to Ying Wu Cheng China Ying Wu Cheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Ying Wu Cheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wouter Van Bogaert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter Van Bogaert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter Van Bogaert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter Van Bogaert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter Van Bogaert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter Van Bogaert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter Van Bogaert. The network helps show where Wouter Van Bogaert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wouter Van Bogaert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wouter Van Bogaert Line = papers co-authored together Wouter Van Bogaert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201982
2 202054
3 202120
4 202316
5 202311
6 202410
7
The Predictive Value of Fear Avoidance Beliefs for Outcomes Following Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Best Evidence Synthesis.
20227
8 20245
9 20225
10 20215
11 20234
12 20232
13 20231
14 20241
15 20250
16 20250

About Wouter Van Bogaert

Wouter Van Bogaert is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (16 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (6 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (5 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers) and Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (168 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (64 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (19 citations), Rehabilitation (19 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (49 citations). Wouter Van Bogaert has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jo Nijs, Eva Huysmans, Iris Coppieters, Ward Willaert, Adriaan Louw, Kelly Ickmans, Anneleen Malfliet, Thomas Bilterys, Paul van Wilgen and Megan Donaldson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Medicine, Physical Therapy, Journal of Pain, Pain Medicine and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact