Wouter Van Bogaert

426 citations
16 papers · 250 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Wouter Van Bogaert

14 papers receiving 243 citations

Peers

Wouter Van Bogaert
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Pharmacology 129
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 31
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 10
  • Rehabilitation 11
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 2
Replace Stéphanie Grosdent with:
Stéphanie Grosdent Belgium
Ying Wu Cheng China
Mazyad Alotaibi Saudi Arabia
Enrique Lluch‐Girbés Spain
Anne Lovise Nordstoga Norway
Eveline Van Looveren Belgium
Adriana Addison United States
Patrick Stegeman Netherlands
Inmaculada Aguilar Spain
D. Ellington United States
Wouter Van Bogaert relative to Stéphanie Grosdent Belgium Stéphanie Grosdent's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Stéphanie Grosdent · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wouter Van Bogaert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter Van Bogaert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter Van Bogaert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter Van Bogaert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter Van Bogaert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter Van Bogaert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter Van Bogaert. The network helps show where Wouter Van Bogaert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wouter Van Bogaert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wouter Van Bogaert Line = papers co-authored together Wouter Van Bogaert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201986
2 202059
3 202120
4 202319
5 202418
6 202315
7
The Predictive Value of Fear Avoidance Beliefs for Outcomes Following Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Best Evidence Synthesis.
20228
8 20216
9 20235
10 20225
11 20245
12 20232
13 20241
14 20231
15 20250
16 20250

About Wouter Van Bogaert

Wouter Van Bogaert is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 250 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (13 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (129 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (31 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (10 citations), Rehabilitation (11 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (2 citations). Wouter Van Bogaert has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jo Nijs, Eva Huysmans, Iris Coppieters, Ward Willaert, Adriaan Louw, Kelly Ickmans, Anneleen Malfliet, Thomas Bilterys, Paul van Wilgen and Kory Zimney. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Medicine, Physical Therapy, Journal of Pain, Quality of Life Research and British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact