Wolfram Schnabel

6.7k citations
271 papers · 5.9k · h-index 41

Impact in

Papers in

Wolfram Schnabel

263 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Peers

Wolfram Schnabel
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Organic Chemistry 3.2k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 897
  • Polymers and Plastics 1.3k
  • Orthodontics 303
  • Materials Chemistry 1.6k
Replace Itaru Mita with:
Itaru Mita Japan
Roberto L. Sastre Spain
Sabine Beuermann Germany
Jiřı́ Dybal Czechia
Alex M. van Herk Netherlands
Francesco Ciardelli Italy
V. Ramakrishnan India
Toyoko Imae Japan
Kenichi Nakashima Japan
Robin A. Hutchinson Canada
Wolfram Schnabel relative to Itaru Mita Japan Itaru Mita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.2×
Itaru Mita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wolfram Schnabel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfram Schnabel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfram Schnabel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfram Schnabel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wolfram Schnabel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfram Schnabel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfram Schnabel. The network helps show where Wolfram Schnabel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wolfram Schnabel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wolfram Schnabel Line = papers co-authored together Wolfram Schnabel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 271 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Polymer degradation : principles and practical applications
1981368
2 1991140
3 1985129
4 1981128
5 1992106
6 200790
7 198587
8 199085
9 199784
10 197283
11 199182
12 199377
13 199176
14 199673
15 199470
16 198467
17 197667
18 199367
19 199966
20 198265

About Wolfram Schnabel

Wolfram Schnabel is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Polymers and Plastics, Materials Chemistry and Surfaces, Coatings and Films, having authored 271 papers that have together received 5.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (78 papers), Photopolymerization techniques and applications (72 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (52 papers), Radical Photochemical Reactions (39 papers), Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry (32 papers), Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation (27 papers), Polymer Science and PVC (18 papers) and Polymer crystallization and properties (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (3.2k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (897 citations), Polymers and Plastics (1.3k citations), Orthodontics (303 citations) and Materials Chemistry (1.6k citations). Wolfram Schnabel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Yusuf Yağcı, Takashi Sumiyoshi, Gürkan Hızal, Ivan Kmínek, Stanislav Nešpůrek, Andreas Henne, Tetsuro Majima, Masahiro Irie, G. Beck and Wilhelm Weber. Their work appears in journals such as European Polymer Journal, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A Chemistry, Macromolecules, Polymer and Polymer Degradation and Stability.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact