W.L. Barr

865 citations
46 papers · 542 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

W.L. Barr

42 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers

W.L. Barr
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 270
  • Radiation 54
  • Aerospace Engineering 148
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 32
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 46
Replace T. Kammash with:
T. Kammash United States
Michl Binderbauer United States
G. Gerdin United States
I.R. Lindemuth United States
E.J. Lauer United States
R. E. Pechacek United States
G. Yonas United States
F. J. Wessel United States
R.F. Post United States
H.G. Ahlstrom United States
W.L. Barr relative to T. Kammash United States T. Kammash's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
T. Kammash · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W.L. Barr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.L. Barr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.L. Barr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.L. Barr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.L. Barr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.L. Barr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.L. Barr. The network helps show where W.L. Barr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W.L. Barr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W.L. Barr Line = papers co-authored together W.L. Barr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1962161
2 197356
3 199232
4 198328
5 198227
6
Feasibility study of a fission-suppressed tandem-mirror hybrid reactor
198225
7 196522
8 196618
9 199014
10 197114
11 196814
12 199113
13 197412
14 196212
15 197412
16 19757
17 19777
18 19585
19 19915
20 19894

About W.L. Barr

W.L. Barr is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Radiation and Materials Chemistry, having authored 46 papers that have together received 542 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (20 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (18 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (14 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (11 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (9 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (6 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (6 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (270 citations), Radiation (54 citations), Aerospace Engineering (148 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (32 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (46 citations). W.L. Barr has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include R.W. Moir, W. A. Perkins, G.W. Hamilton, B.G. Logan, Richard F. Post, J. Fink, George H. Miley, L.J. Perkins, Raymond L. Kelly and J.A. Crotinger. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Nuclear Fusion, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Journal of Applied Physics and Journal of Fusion Energy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact