Wing-Cheong Lo

913 citations
42 papers · 641 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Wing-Cheong Lo

40 papers receiving 634 citations

Peers

Wing-Cheong Lo
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Modeling and Simulation 100
  • Cell Biology 182
  • Molecular Biology 397
  • Aging 9
  • Biophysics 22
Replace Philip Greulich with:
Philip Greulich United Kingdom
Richard Joh United States
Melpomeni Platani United Kingdom
Wenqiang Shi China
Noa Bossel Ben‐Moshe Israel
Nilah Monnier United States
Lindsay N. Carpp United States
Peggy Paschke United Kingdom
Jonathan Franca‐Koh United States
Weikang Wang China
Wing-Cheong Lo relative to Philip Greulich United Kingdom Philip Greulich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Philip Greulich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wing-Cheong Lo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wing-Cheong Lo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wing-Cheong Lo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wing-Cheong Lo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wing-Cheong Lo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wing-Cheong Lo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wing-Cheong Lo. The network helps show where Wing-Cheong Lo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wing-Cheong Lo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wing-Cheong Lo Line = papers co-authored together Wing-Cheong Lo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012120
2 200884
3 200966
4 201666
5 201034
6 201324
7 201321
8 201419
9 201519
10 201416
11 201615
12 201215
13 201714
14 201913
15 201712
16 201910
17 201610
18 20219
19 20129
20 20218

About Wing-Cheong Lo

Wing-Cheong Lo is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, Cell Biology and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 42 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (12 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (9 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (8 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (8 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (6 papers), Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth (5 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (4 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (100 citations), Cell Biology (182 citations), Molecular Biology (397 citations), Aging (9 citations) and Biophysics (22 citations). Wing-Cheong Lo has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Qing Nie, Arthur D. Lander, Ching‐Shan Chou, Frederic Y. M. Wan, S. Kevin Zhou, Hay-Oak Park, Enrico Gratton, Jeffrey L. Suhalim, Michelle A. Digman and Avner Friedman. Their work appears in journals such as Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, Chaos Solitons & Fractals, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, Journal of Computational Physics and Molecular Biology of the Cell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact