Wilson Lim

19 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Wilson Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Microbiology 101
  • Small Animals 71
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 47
  • Surgery 94
  • Infectious Diseases 35
Replace Pius A. Morozumi with:
Pius A. Morozumi United States
Aurore Bousquet France
T.-D. Huang Belgium
R.W. Brimicombe Netherlands
G. Pizzarelli Italy
H Junge Switzerland
J. Rehage Germany
Carlos Ruiz de Alegría Puig Spain
Mike Marvin Ruth Netherlands
S. N. Gaur India
Wilson Lim relative to Pius A. Morozumi United States Pius A. Morozumi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×49×
Pius A. Morozumi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wilson Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wilson Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wilson Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wilson Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wilson Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wilson Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wilson Lim. The network helps show where Wilson Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wilson Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wilson Lim Line = papers co-authored together Wilson Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199753
2 199744
3 201933
4 202230
5 202029
6 201829
7 202217
8 202016
9 202215
10 202215
11 202013
12 199812
13 20189
14 20218
15 20216
16
Perioperative death in Malaysia: the transition phase from a developing nation to a developed one.
20035
17 19942
18 20202
19
Comparison of propofol and methohexitone as an induction agent in anaesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy.
19971
20 20250

About Wilson Lim

Wilson Lim is a scholar working on Microbiology, Small Animals, Surgery, Insect Science and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Actinomycetales infections and treatment (10 papers), Infectious Diseases and Mycology (7 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (2 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (2 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (2 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (101 citations), Small Animals (71 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (47 citations), Surgery (94 citations) and Infectious Diseases (35 citations). Wilson Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sudan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Wendy W. J. van de Sande, M. J. Paech, Ahmed Hassan Fahal, Sharon Evans, T. J. G. Pavy, Annelies Verbon, Kimberly Eadie, Kevin Kavanagh, Gerard Sheehan and Sarah Ahmed. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS neglected tropical diseases, Medical Mycology, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Anesthesia & Analgesia and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact