William Stokes

1.8k citations
71 papers · 869 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

William Stokes

67 papers receiving 802 citations

Peers

William Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Otorhinolaryngology 69
  • Infectious Diseases 251
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 111
  • Molecular Medicine 27
  • Clinical Biochemistry 34
Replace Lei Gao with:
Lei Gao China
Raika Durusoy Türkiye
Kristin Adler Germany
Miriam A. Knoll United States
Yazan Hassona Jordan
Sonia Gupta India
Sadeep Shrestha United States
Andrés Blanco Carrión Spain
Lael M. Yonker United States
Raghunath Misra India
William Stokes relative to Lei Gao China Lei Gao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Lei Gao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Stokes. The network helps show where William Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Stokes Line = papers co-authored together William Stokes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Mentoring the mentor : a critical dialogue with Paulo Freire
1997157
2 1961119
3 202072
4 202034
5 202131
6 202226
7 202223
8 201323
9 202221
10 202421
11 201819
12 202218
13 202216
14 201916
15 202115
16 201815
17 202114
18 202313
19 202113
20 202112

About William Stokes

William Stokes is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Otorhinolaryngology, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 71 papers that have together received 869 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Head and Neck Cancer Studies (15 papers), SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (9 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (8 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (6 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (6 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (5 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers) and Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (69 citations), Infectious Diseases (251 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (111 citations), Molecular Medicine (27 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (34 citations). William Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Donaldo Macedo, James W. Fraser, Paulo Freiré, John C. Lam, Byron M. Berenger, Graham Tipples, Jia Hu, Raynell Lang, Jamil N. Kanji and Allison A. Venner. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Journal of Clinical Oncology, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Open Forum Infectious Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact